Colorado Horse Rescue Poisons Wildlife

Lethal Policy Reversal Kills Prairie Dogs; Activists Attempt Rescue

 

Please protest Colorado Horse Rescue’s cruel, senseless killing of prairie dogs and other animals who share their burrows. Contact CHR to demand that its current board of directors be dismissed immediately and that a new board of directors be installed that will guarantee the organization will not harm wildlife. More information below.

 

Colorado Horse Rescue

10386 N. 65th St.,

Longmont, CO 80503

tel: 720-494-1414

fax: 720-494-1415

e-mail: info@chr.org

 

Please urge Boulder County Commissioners Paul Danish, Ronald K. Stewart and Jana Mendez to penalize CHR to the full extent possible. Urge greater protection for prairie dogs, including a policy of no net loss of prairie dog habitat and a preference for leaving existing colonies alone.
Boulder County Commissioners
P.O. Box 471
Boulder, CO 80306
tel: (303) 441-3500 fax: (303) 441-4525

Also, please send a letter to the editor to the following addresses:

Boulder Daily Camera openforum@thedailycamera.com

Boulder Weekly editorial@boulderweekly.com

Longmont Times-Call opinion@times-call.com

 

 

And, finally, protest directly to current CHR Board of Directors member:

 

Mr. Harvey Yoakum

303-776-2889 or 303-776-1408

 

 

On Tuesday, May 8, Colorado Horse Rescue (CHR) stunned local community members, animal protectionists, and Boulder County officials by poisoning hundreds of prairie dogs on CHR’s 50-acre site. CHR is a nonprofit group that rehabilitates neglected and abandoned horses and promotes their adoptions. A complaint from a whistleblower prompted county zoning inspector Ed Meacham to visit CHR’s facility, where he immediately ordered contractors to stop poisoning. Volunteers then spent hours digging out the poisoned burrows, trying to save some of the animals while CHR staff and volunteers stood by joking. It appears that no prairie dogs, including this spring’s babies, survived the assault.

 

The massacre was hideously cruel. Graham Billingsley, director of the county's Land Use Department, said contractors hired by CHR stuffed the prairie dog holes with newspaper soaked with poison. The exterminators then packed the holes with rocks and dirt, trapping the animals underground. The poison, aluminum phosphide, causes the animals to bleed internally and die in excruciating pain over the course of several hours, even days, while trapped underground.

 

CHR received approval from Boulder County to move its operation to the site on the condition that the land would be revegetated to prevent dust and soil erosion, conditions worsened by horse grazing. Officials from the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) said they believed that the prairie dogs would be protected on the property. As part of an officially supported revegetation project, the state spent more than $2,300 reseeding 35 acres with native grasses and trees last summer. The project was meant to create wildlife habitat for deer, rabbits, foxes, and prairie dogs. Astonishingly, many of the animals who've been poisoned over time had been previously relocated on the property in order to make room for CHR’s new buildings.

 

CHR officials claim they can not revegetate the property without killing prairie dogs; however CDOW officials are confident that revegetation can occur without harming the animals. CHR representatives also claim that horses can break their legs in prairie dog holes. However, no such case has ever been documented among grazing horses (i.e., horses who are not being ridden or driven).

 

The story was covered by several newspapers, KGNU (Boulder Community Radio -- kgnu.org), and Denver’s Channel 9.

 

NEWSPAPER ACCOUNTS

 

May 17, 2001
Not a case of 'either-or'
Boulder Daily Camera Editorial

It seems almost everyone's an expert on prairie dogs, based - presumably - upon "obvious" visual evidence: "Why, the little buggers are everywhere, I see them by the road (and sometimes in the road, in less-than vital condition) when I commute to work!" But sometimes, what seems obvious to the casual observer, isn't.

The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, not known for its radical environmentalism, just last year ruled that the black-tailed prairie dog should be placed on the threatened species list, but wouldn't be, because of budgetary constraints. Why? Because even though the best scientific estimates (not the ravings of environmentalists, as Western politicians love to claim) there are 10 to 15 million of the animals left.


That may seem like a lot, but those numbers represent a 99 percent reduction in their historic levels. Entire ecosystems depend on the rodents: Reduce prairie dogs and you harm everything from burrowing owls to hawks. Contrary to frequent squawks from the agriculture lobby, livestock seldom break bones in prairie dog burrows. And while the rodents can carry bubonic plague, the transmission danger to humans is next to nil.


Yes, they some times denude grasslands (especially in the absence of predators, which humans have driven into oblivion, too), but there are management solutions to such problems. But the solution shouldn't be to send people into your fields to casually drop repulsively cruel poison into active burrows - especially when you've made agreements with Boulder County and the state Division of Wildlife not to do it.


So it pains us to note that an otherwise well-meaning organization, Colorado Horse Rescue, has done precisely that. And as much as we appreciate the group's mission to save abused, neglected and abandoned horses, we cannot condone its cavalier destruction of prairie dogs and abrogation of governmental agreements.


Following an initial order from the county to cease gassing prairie dogs on May 8, at least one CHR official spoke with regrettable arrogance, setting up a false, zero-sum competitive situation between horses and prairie dogs. It's simply not so. We appreciate what CHR does. But we're disappointed that it has displayed such narrow-mindedness on the prairie dog issue - that the animals are "pests" and "varmints" to be disposed of, ecosystem be damned. No doubt the group regrets its decision now, because of the bad p.r. if nothing else.


Here's hoping members will reconsider their choices, vigorously and sincerely renew commitments to the state and county, and forge ahead with their mission of saving horses - and prairie dogs. If they can't do that, then they should have their Site Plan Review revoked by the county.



May 13, 2001

Horses Versus Prairie Dogs

By Chris Barge, Boulder Daily Camera Staff Writer

 

"Getting rid of prairie dogs" has a different meaning in some parts of Boulder County than in others.

In Boulder, it means gently moving the black-tailed critters from one colony to another.

In horse country southwest of Hygiene, it apparently means poisoning the pests and burying them in their holes.

The difference was made clear this week when a Boulder County zoning enforcement officer stopped three people in the act of poisoning and burying a colony of prairie dogs on a 50-acre property operated by the nonprofit Colorado Horse Rescue.

The officer, Ed Meacham, was sent to the property Tuesday afternoon after neighbors called Boulder County Commissioner Ron Stewart to complain about the exterminations.

Meacham said the two men and the woman who were there were armed with shovels and a can he presumed to be filled with poison.

"I walked into the field and asked them what they were doing and they said, 'We're killing prairie dogs,' and I told them to stop that," Meacham said.

Two neighbors who live across the street from the Horse Rescue property said Friday that they also witnessed the three people killing prairie dogs.

Graham Billingsly, county Land Use Department director, said Colorado Horse Rescue in 1999 agreed to relocate a colony of prairie dogs without killing them in exchange for permission to operate on the land. He said the commitment had "the force of regulation," even though prairie dogs are pests under state law and it is legal to kill them on private property.

Horse Rescue spokeswoman Penny Storchevoy said she did not know about the incident. The group's barn manager, Nan Millett, said the organization had "gone by every rule that's been put down in front of us."

Depending on who is talking, the incident was either the result of blatant disregard for the county's rules or the result of a genuine misunderstanding.

The county in 1999 ordered Horse Rescue to revegetate the dry, weed-infested land with native grasses and plants to prevent dust and erosion. Millett said revegetating the land while protecting prairie dogs was difficult because the rodents ate the grass seed.

"It failed miserably," said Rob Alexander, a county Parks and Open Space Department employee who was asked by Commissioner Stewart in 1999 to head an advisory committee to help with the revegetation effort.

At the property Friday, hundreds of prairie dogs scurried back and forth among their holes, sometimes between the hoofs of horses.

Alexander said Horse Rescue board members Jay Hearst and Harvey Yoakum told him in January that they were going to "get rid of the prairie dogs."

"It was clear to me they were going to exterminate them rather than remove them," Alexander said.

Alexander said he was not aware at the time that the company had committed to not killing prairie dogs. He said he neither advised them to stop nor to go forward with their plans to exterminate.

County zoning enforcement officer Meacham said that when he stopped the prairie-dog killings in progress Tuesday, the workers called Yoakum on a cellular telephone from the field and asked him to speak with Meacham. Yoakum told him that "somebody at Parks and Open Space" had approved the extermination, Meacham said.

Hearst and Yoakum were unavailable for comment Friday.

Hearst resigned from the board May 1, and Yoakum joined the board early this year, Alexander said. Both worked with Alexander as liaisons to the revegetation advisory committee for the horse rescue group.

Storchevoy, a board member as well as a spokeswoman for the group, said Horse Rescue tries to avoid conflicts with wildlife.

She said she did not hear of the allegations of poisoning until after animal-rights activists, including some from Rocky Mountain Animal Defense, spent four hours Tuesday night pulling poison-soaked newspapers out of prairie dog burrows.

The activists were eventually ordered to leave by the Sheriff's Office.

The horse rescue group had asked the state Division of Wildlife for help to move the prairie dogs under the division's Cooperative Habitat Program.

The division spent $2,385 to create a habitat for the prairie dogs and other wildlife on 35 acres of the rescue group's property, plus more for labor and equipment, division spokesman Todd Malmsbury said.

Wildlife manager Katie Kinney said the rescue group might be asked to reimburse the state for those costs.

"There was no point in planting the habitat if they were going to kill the wildlife," Kinney said.

Susan Miller of Wild Places, an organization that relocates prairie dogs, said the horse rescue group should be held accountable for violating an agreement with the county and with all the people that worked hard to relocate the prairie dogs there.

"Basically what they did was dotted all their 'i's and crossed all their 't's and then went ahead and snubbed their nose at everybody and killed all the prairie dogs," Miller said.

But neighbor Suzanne Anderson, who volunteers with the horse rescue group to help save abused and abandoned horses, said she condoned the prairie dog killings because the "rodents" were taking over the pasture.

Colorado Horse Rescue provides shelter, care, rehabilitation and adoption services for abused, abandoned, neglected and unwanted horses.

"When it comes down to saving a horse or a prairie dog, I will save the horse," Anderson said.

 

 

 


May 10, 2001

Prairie Dogs May Be Trouble for CHR

Eric Frankowski, Longmont Daily Times-Call

HYGIENE - County officials are looking into an incident in which the nonprofit group Colorado Horse Rescue poisoned up to several hundred prairie dogs, and in the act may have violated its development permit.

On Tuesday, after a neighbor of the horse-rehabilitation center and shelter phoned in a complaint, county zoning inspector Ed Meacham visited the facility south of Hygiene and told contractors who were gassing a prairie dog colony to cease their operations.

Conservationists and animal rights activists, about 20 of whom converged on CHR's 50-acre property to protest the extermination, staunchly defend prairie dogs as a keystone species in prairie ecosystems, but under state law, the animals are considered rodent pests and it is legal to kill them on private property.

However, Tuesday's action by CHR may have violated conditions put on it in September 1999, when the group received approval to move its operations to the property on 65th Street.

According to county spokesman Jim Burrus, as part of CHR's land-use approval, the county told the group it had to revegetate the dry, weed-infested land with native grasses and plants to prevent continued dust and erosion, and that it must move a resident prairie dog colony from 8 acres where a barn, arena, corrals, offices and other buildings were planned on the southern end of the site.

"As a general policy, Boulder County does not condone the extermination of prairie dogs and, when site-plan review opportunities present themselves, attempts to compel landowners to preserve these important links in the food chain," Burrus said. "This was the case with Colorado Horse Rescue."

He said the county made it clear at a Sept. 9, 1999, hearing "that Colorado Horse Rescue was allowed to relocate those prairie dogs to another part of their property, but not off the property."

However, whether Tuesday's poisonings violate the letter of the county permit to develop the shelter is still unanswered.

"That's a possibility," Burrus said. "It's something we're looking into."

Following Tuesday's incident, CHR barn manager Nan Millett said the organization had complied with all county requirements.

"We've gone by every rule that's been put down in front of us," she said.

Millett also said CHR hired Boulder-based Wild Places to relocate the prairie dogs last summer, but that revegetating the land and trying to protect the animals at the same time was difficult because they eat the seed and prevent the land from being irrigated.

The county responded by saying that if there was a problem complying with the county-approved revegetation plan, Colorado Horse Rescue should have contacted officials to discuss the problem.

"They're saying the county is responsible because we required them to revegetate an area where the prairie dogs were," Burrus said. "But we told them they should relocate the animals before they did the revegetation.

"In no way, shape or form did we allude to them that they should exterminate the prairie dogs," he said.

The county may not be the only bureaucracy interested in the case. CHR also may be in at least luke-warm water with the Colorado Division of Wildlife.

As part of the county's conditions requiring habitat improvement, the group asked the state wildlife agency for help under the auspices of its Cooperative Habitat Program.

The DOW spent $2,385 on materials for the project plus an unknown amount on labor and equipment, spokesman Todd Malmsbury said.

"We went out there and planted native grasses and tress last year to create habitat so the prairie dogs and horses could both live together," said area wildlife manager Katie Kinney, who worked on the project.

The DOW's participation in the revegetation plan, Kinney said, was entirely contingent on the benefit to prairie dogs.

"There was no point in planting the habitat if they were going to kill the wildlife," she said. "We were planting it for prairie dogs. We're a wildlife agency. We don't go in to plant for horses.

"If they killed the prairie dogs, then the habitat we planted doesn't benefit wildlife."

Because of poor precipitation in 2000, Kinney said, the habitat improvements were not as successful as hoped, but regardless of the outcome, "the money was still spent on the project."

Before determining what to do next, she said she wanted to re-examine the contract with Colorado Horse Rescue, but added that a likely course of action would be to seek recompensation from the organization for the DOW's costs because of failure to meet the habitat obligations.

Penny Storchevoy, a member of CHR's board of directors, said she was not aware of any problems with the DOW, and that as far as she knew the organization had complied with the county's directives.

"Why incite a controversy where there is not one?" she asked.

"All I know is that a group of people were trespassing on CHR property last night, and they made verbal threats," she said of the activists. "The sheriff was called, and they were asked to leave."

 


May 10, 2001

Agency Accused of Prairie Dog Abuse

By Beth Wohlberg, Boulder Daily Camera Staff Writer

 

Boulder County blamed Colorado Horse Rescue on Wednesday for poisoning prairie dogs on the nonprofit's 50-acre site off 65th Street near Nelson Road in Hygiene.

On Tuesday, a zoning enforcement officer halted workers in the middle of killing the animals, said Graham Billingsley, director of the county's Land Use Department. Billingsley said workers hired by Horse Rescue, had been stuffing prairie dog holes with newspaper soaked in a gas that causes the rodents to bleed internally and explode.

"This was certainly not in keeping with the approval given to their location," said Boulder County Commissioner Ron Stewart. "It's not that the prairie dogs would have to be where they are." He said Colorado Horse Rescue had previously made a commitment to relocate the animals.

The county approved the group's move to the Hygiene site on the condition that the land would be revegetated to prevent dust and soil erosion, particularly because horse grazing can make those problems worse. The operation takes in neglected or abandoned horses in an effort to rehabilitate them and place them in good homes.

If prairie dogs interfered with revegetation, county officials said, they expected the organization's managers to arrange for relocation.

Colorado Division of Wildlife officials said they were under the impression that prairie dogs would be protected on the property. Last summer, as part of an officially supported revegetation project, the state spent more than $2,300 reseeding 35 acres with native grasses and trees.

The project was intended to create upland wildlife habitat for species such as deer, rabbits and prairie dogs, said Todd Malmsbury of the Division of Wildlife.

"The reason we did the work was because prairie dogs and other species were out there," said Katie Kinney, an area wildlife manager for the division. "We would not have done this if we knew they would poison prairie dogs. We are not in the business of providing habitat for domestic animals."

Penny Storchevoy, public relations coordinator of Colorado Horse Rescue, said she doesn't know anything about the poisoning. She said the organization has taken steps to avoid any conflicts with wildlife, including relocating prairie dogs from one area of their land to another for construction.

She said she was only aware of the allegations of poisoning, which were made by animal rights activists who spent four hours Tuesday night uncovering prairie dog burrows and pulling poison-soaked newspaper out of the holes.

“We're taking Colorado Horse Rescue to task," said Dave Crawford of Boulder's Rocky Mountain Animal Defense. "If these guys wanted to live in a sterile environment, they shouldn't have moved to the country."

 


May 9, 2001

Prairie Dogs Reportedly Poisoned

Joe Hanel, Longmont Daily Times-Call

HYGIENE — Hundreds of prairie dogs in a pasture at Colorado Horse Rescue apparently have been poisoned, activists say.

About 20 people from Rocky Mountain Animal Defense and other groups descended on the 50-acre property on 65th Street on Tuesday afternoon after a neighbor called to say prairie dogs were being gassed.

"These people know better," said David Crawford, executive director of RMAD. "This casts a very dark shadow on the work that they do. They can't call themselves animal-friendly at this point."

Aluminum phosphide is commonly used to kill prairie dogs. Newspapers soaked in the poison are stuffed into the burrows. It "causes a slow, agonizing death in which the prairie dogs bleed internally and literally explode," RMAD's Jill Bielawski said.

Crumpled newspapers littered the ground on the horse rescue property Tuesday evening.

The activists entered the field to dig out the newspapers and look for sick prairie dogs. They didn't find any — living or dead.

CHR employees and volunteers said the activists were trespassing and insulting. They called sheriff's deputies to the scene after one woman threatened to vandalize the property, they said.

No one was arrested or ticketed, according to Sheriff's Deputy Kris Jakobsson. Two deputies stayed on the property until the activists left and took the names of everyone who was trespassing.

The prairie dog problem has vexed Colorado Horse Rescue — which takes in and rehabilitates unwanted horses — since it moved to the property last year.

"When we purchased the land, we were told two things needed to be done," said Nan Millett, the barn manger for CHR, who lives on the property. "One is to plant vegetation, and the other is to relocate (or) cohabitate with the prairie dogs here."

But relocating the prairie dogs proved difficult. CHR hired Wild Places to move some of the dogs last summer, but thousands remain, Millett said.

Susan Miller of Wild Places relocated some prairie dogs to a parcel of the CHR property last summer. She returned Tuesday to dig newspapers out of the burrows — some of them the same she had moved the dogs to last year.

"There's no point to putting the dogs through all this trauma, hiring a company to do this, and then poisoning them," she said.

Amid the tension, CHR representatives think they have found a solution. One of their volunteers offered Tuesday evening to relocate the remaining dogs at no cost, without killing them, Millett said.

CHR's 50 acres are mostly dirt, scattered with tiny weeds and prairie dog burrows.

It's essential that the property be revegetated, County Commissioner Ron Stewart said.

"If there isn't vegetation on it, it just blows away," Stewart said. He said the denuded field also invites weeds.

Stewart said he heard of the poisoning Tuesday afternoon when a neighbor called.

"We actually have a condition that says they should relocate (the prairie dogs)," Stewart said.

Millett said the horse rescue has complied with its agreement with the county.

"We've gone by every rule that's been put down in front of us," she said.

Revegetating the land while saving the prairie dogs is very difficult, Millett said. The prairie dogs eat the grass seed, and the field can't be irrigated while the dogs are in it.

"I once stayed up 24 hours to take care of a sick horse," she said. "I know what it is like to take care of an animal that can't take care of itself.

"We're not the bad guys here. We're trying not to be."

Joe Hanel can be reached at 303-776-2244, Ext. 228, or by e-mail at jhanel@times-call.com

 


 

Animal advocates at war

Horse rescuers poison prairie dogs; state official “disturbed”

by Staff, Boulder Weekly

HYGIENE-Two animal rescue groups are at war after Colorado Horse Rescue poisoned hundreds of prairie dogs on a 50-acre pasture on North 65th Street Tuesday, May 8.

Employees and volunteers with the Rocky Mountain Animal Defense Fund raced to the scene and worked desperately to dig poison-soaked newspapers out of some 200 prairie dog boroughs. They arrived between four to seven hours after poison was placed in the holes, and it's not known whether any animals were saved.

"They (Colorado Horse Rescue) apparently have even poisoned some of the very prairie dogs that they had relocated to a prairie dog preserve on the property," says Jill Bielawski, media coordinator for the animal defense fund.

Katie Kinney, area wildlife manager for the Colorado Department of Wildlife, says it appears Colorado Horse Rescue violated a contract involving a habitat improvement grant. She said the state will likely seek return of thousands of dollars given to the organization to save prairie dogs.

"I'm disturbed by this," Kinney says. "We had a contract with them, entered into under the direction of Boulder County Commissioners just last year, and I believe it has been violated."

Horse rescue officials said the prairie dog rescuers were trespassing Tuesday, and they summoned Boulder County Sheriff's deputies to the scene. Nobody was arrested or cited.

Penny Storchevoy, vice president of Colorado Horse Rescue's board of directors, said prairie dogs have been killed on the property because Boulder County officials ordered the organization to revegitate it. She said decisions pertaining to revegetation were made by a committee appointed jointly by Colorado Horse Rescue and the Boulder County Commission.

While digging up newspapers, soaked with deadly aluminum phosphide, Bielawski expressed anger and said poisoning prairie dogs is inhumane and cruel.

"It's terrible how these poor animals die, bleeding to death internally," Bielawski said, stuffing handfuls of poisoned newspapers into a sack.

Dave Crawford, executive director of the Rocky Mountain Animal Defense Fund, yelled at horse rescuers as he ran into the pasture with his shovel.

"You're in violation of Amendment 14," Crawford shouted. "You people are in deep shit! We had an agreement, and you broke it!"

Amendment 14 refers to a portion of the Colorado Constitution that protects some small wildlife species, such as Cottontail Rabbits and various snakes. Earlier this year Boulder County District Judge Frank Dubosky granted an injunction to temporarily halt a mass prairie dog poisoning because he was convinced that animals protected under Amendment 14 sometimes live in prairie dog holes and are inadvertently killed by aluminum phosphide.

The "agreement" Crawford spoke of involves a prairie dog relocation permit the horse rescue group obtained last year in order to build a horse barn and corrals on part of the property. Working with the Colorado Department of Wildlife and Boulder County, the horse rescue group agreed to relocate all prairie dogs that lived on the building site to the southeast corner of the property.

"It was obvious that they have been poisoning prairie dogs for quite some time," says Susan Miller, director of The Wild Places, a Boulder-based organization dedicated to saving prairie dogs. "In the area that had been successfully established as a relocation site, there were no prairie dogs. All of the burrows were plugged with rocks, and they had placed corrals out there. Obviously, they just wanted to placate the public and the Department of Wildlife, get their building up, and then do whatever they wanted."

Horse Rescue officials at the scene said the county's order to revegetate make it necessary to kill prairie dogs. They said prairie dogs eat new grass, making it difficult to establish thick vegetation.

"I'm beyond being upset," Miller says. "They completely reneged. They completely violated their permit. Had we known they were going to kill all of these dogs, we would not have gone through the whole process of a relocation."

Storchevoy says Colorado Horse Rescue could decide to press trespassing charges against the prairie dog rescuers.

"At this point we have no plans to pursue that," Storchevoy said.

 

RMAD Home About Us Action Alerts Programs Support RMAD Resources RMAD Store Contact Us Calendar Volunteer Achievements FAQ